Bookmark and Share
Previous article

News Articles

  • Council wastes $43,000 on defending their position against a $93 parking fine
  • 18/07/2018 Make a Comment (2)
  • Contributed by: BigJoe ( 1 article in 2018 )
Be Grateful Today!

The Melbourne-based man was fined $93 in may 2017 for violating a road rule in Nunawading

Man contesting $93 parking fine costs council $43,000 in legal fees as judge slams him for taking the matter all the way to the Supreme Court

  • A Melbourne man has been slammed by a judge for wasting the court's time
  • Judge: 'He has doggedly sought to avoid prosecution in the Magistrates’ Court'
  • The man was fined $93 in may 2017 for violating a road rule in Nunawading
  • The legal proceedings have cost the Whitehorse Council $43,000 in total

A man has been told off by a judge for wasting the Supreme Court's time by battling a parking fine in a case that has cost a local council $43,000.

The Melbourne-based man was fined $93 in may 2017 for violating a road rule in Nunawading, Victoria where he parked his motorhome in a disabled parking bay.

Mr Andrew Crowther waited nine months for his hearing but in the end his appeal was dismissed as an attempt to abuse the judicial process, the Herald Sun reports.

He appealed to Whitehorse Council after local law officers issued him a parking ticket for having parked a heavy vehicle in a built-up area for more than an hour without permission from the council.

Mr Crowther argued the disabled parking permit on his vehicle constitutionally allowed him to park in that space.

The council ruled against Mr Crowther as it found the permit did not overrule the road rule.

Justice Zammit found his appeal to be an attempt 'to abuse the processes of the Court'

Mr Crowther then appealed to the Magistrates' Court and simultaneously raised an appeal in the Supreme Court for judicial review as he considered it to be an interpretation issue.

Supreme Court Justice Zammit said the appellant had been dodging the parking fine in a legal process that cost Whitehorse Council $43,000 in legal fees.

'The reality is that the appellant has doggedly sought to avoid his prosecution in the Magistrates’ Court by initiating civil proceedings in this Court,' Justice Zammit said.

The judge also said similar applications for judicial review have increased lately and called them 'ill-founded'.

Read more:


    By:Brett Waters from Qld, Australia on July 19, 2018 @ 8:56 am
    yet another example of judges bias toward anybody not in their private bar society; ie common folk like you and me and let's not forget Andrew who gracefully highlighted such absurdity.
    By:Sol from sa, Aust on July 18, 2018 @ 7:54 pm
    Maybe all parking tickets are ill-founded in the first instance judge, under invalid legislation without any head of power and in breach of the 1855 Victorian Constitution and Commonwealth Constitution.

    Well done to Andrew Crowther!!

    This Council CEO should be facing criminal charges for mishandling rates payer's funds, only serving to highlight more abuse of Council processes.

(Note: If wrong - comments will not be posted)

1Will not be visible to public.
2Receive notification of other comments posted for this article. To cease notification after having posted click here.
3To make a link clickable in the comments box enclose in link tags - ie.<link>Link</link>.

To further have your say, head to our forum Click Here

To contribute a news article Click Here

To view or contribute a Quote Click Here

Hosting & Support by WebPal© 2019 All rights reserved.