Bookmark and Share
Previous article

News Articles

  • Government's welfare card plan 'fails the human rights test': lawyer
  • By NICK BAKER
  • 27/09/2019 Make a Comment (1)
  • Contributed by: Raymond ( 1 article in 2019 )
The cashless welfare cards quarantine 80 cent of Centrelink payments.
Be Grateful Today!
The government is hoping to dramatically expand the use of cashless welfare cards.

The Morrison government's plan to expand the use of cashless welfare cards has been labelled "discriminatory and coercive" by lawyers.

The Human Rights Law Centre (HRLC) slammed the Morrison government's proposals around the cards at a Senate inquiry into the new bill.

"This is the government micro-managing people's lives – denying them the freedom to make decisions about where to buy things like food and clothes, and the option of buying cheaper goods with cash," HRLC senior lawyer Adrianne Walters told the inquiry.

At trial locations in three states, cashless welfare cards quarantine 80 per cent of Centrelink payments so the money can only be spent on essential items, rather than alcohol or gambling.

The government wants to expand this to include an additional 22,000 people in Cape York and the Northern Territory, where 50-100 per cent of income will be quarantined depending on ministerial direction.

But lawyers claim 82 per cent of people likely to be affected by the new bill are Indigenous.

"Imposing a blanket law that forcibly restricts how and where a person can spend their money, fails the human rights test," Ms Walters said.

"At its core, this is a discriminatory and coercive policy. In remote areas, it effectively punishes people who have no choice but to turn to the social safety net because of the lack of paid jobs in their communities. Rather than fix this injustice, the government is seeking to broaden it."

The national trial of the cashless welfare cards is in its fourth year, and without an extension being granted in Parliament it will expire in June next year.

The cards are being rolled out in Kununurra and the Goldfields in Western Australia, Ceduna in South Australia, and Hervey Bay in Queensland.

Draft laws to expand the scheme are before the lower house of federal parliament.

Material from the Department of Social Services states "the Cashless Debit Card is testing whether reducing the amount of cash available in a community will reduce the overall harm caused by welfare fueled alcohol, gambling and drug misuse".

A government report released last year found the cashless debit card has had a "considerable positive impact" in the two trial communities of Ceduna and the East Kimberley.

"[The concept] has been effective in reducing alcohol consumption and gambling in both trial sites and [is] also suggestive of a reduction in the use of illegal drugs," it said.

"[And] there is some evidence that there has been a consequential reduction in violence and harm related to alcohol consumption, illegal drug use and gambling".

Source: https://www.sbs.com.au/news/government-s-welfare-card-plan-fails-the-human-rights-test-lawyer

    By:Sam from Queensland, Australia on November 7, 2019 @ 12:18 pm
    The reason that most people can't find the Head Office of Centrelink is because it is in Kansas.

    If you are experiencing any problems with them write to the Secretary [Renee Leon]. The Secretary will no doubt ignore you as she has me, an Aged Pensioner that has been denied a pension for almost three years.

    What we have in Australia is a foreign private business administering a Public Trust account. They are skimming and instead of paying us they are paying others to fleece us of what we are owed.
    Have been trying to get an answer on were the law is that forces private people to give their private details to a business for several years to no avail.

    They [Centrelink] are using undue influence to force people to fill out their application forms. These forms are corrupted as they are not legal. They breach a legal principle called the "Four corners rule", this rule states that anything inside a box is not to be considered as part of the document. So what we have here is technically a blank document wherein they induce the applicant to sign in another box.

    The answer to this question is that there is not any law and when we fill out their application forms we are volunteering our private info. Just another trick played on the unsuspecting by a Government administering our Public Trust accounts for the UN...

 2+8= 
(Note: If wrong - comments will not be posted)
Footnotes:

1Will not be visible to public.
2Receive notification of other comments posted for this article. To cease notification after having posted click here.
3To make a link clickable in the comments box enclose in link tags - ie.<link>Link</link>.

To further have your say, head to our forum Click Here

To contribute a news article Click Here

To view or contribute a Quote Click Here

Hosting & Support by WebPal© 2019 f4joz.com All rights reserved.