- Abbott government unveils plan to restrict how young people spend dole
- 02/07/2014 Make a Comment (3)
- Contributed by: Guido ( 1 article in 2014 )
Controlling what young people can spend their unemployment benefits on, and moving thousands of people off the disability support pension (DSP), have been flagged in the federal government’s review of the welfare system.
An interim report, titled A New System for Better Employment and Social Outcomes, has been released in the form of a discussion paper, without recommendations.
It suggests streamlining welfare payments into four categories: the age pension; the DSP; a tiered work-age payment and a child payment. There would be more conditions attached to receiving welfare payments, and sanctions that would strip people of income support, for varying lengths of time, if they did not meet the “mutual obligations” requirement.
It says young and single unemployed people should receive lower rates of payment than other unemployed people, and that rent assistance should be reformed into a subsidy scheme for both public and private housing, rather than having public housing rent based on a percentage of a person’s income.
The report also identifies single parents as needing higher rates of payment as their children get older and it is more expensive to support them.
Only people with permanent disabilities should receive the DSP, and people who have partial, or short-term, disabilities should be given unemployment benefits instead, the report suggests. In addition, income management could be expanded into a national scheme so that young, unemployed people could only spend their benefits on certain things, such as food and petrol.
The head of the review, Patrick McClure, said the present welfare system was complex and inefficient, and there were actual disincentives to work. He highlighted people with mental health problems as needing different support to what they receive at present.
“Thirty per cent of people on the disability support pension have mental-health conditions which are episodic in nature; for example, severe depression or anxiety. Experts in the field express the importance of a vocational rehabilitation approach, which links them not only to clinical intervention but also to education and work,” he said on Sunday.
The social services minister, Kevin Andrews, has repeatedly called the DSP a set-and-forget payment, but he would not put a figure on the number of people who could lose the disability pension and be moved onto unemployment benefits.
“This is about recognising that the people on the DSP are not one group; they’re not the same. One of the largest groups on the DSP … is people with psychological illnesses and [a] … lot of that is episodic. There are occasions when people can and can’t work, yet the system doesn’t recognise that at the present time,” he said.
“Will they be forced off the disability support pension? No. This is about the future, as I said, not about the current system at the present time, but about how we can structure a system in the future which will give people the opportunity for what they usually want to do, and that is to be able to work, to be able to contribute. The current system is very inadequate in that regard.”
He said the committee would consider making the unemployment payment higher for people with partial disabilities. The government would get advice on how to classify people with a permanent disability.
Andrews endorsed moving young unemployed people onto income management schemes, giving them welfare in the form of debit cards that could only be used in certain places.
“We would say, you can have a debit card that precludes certain expenditure. It could, for example, preclude expenditure on alcohol. You get a card, go to the bottle shop and they say ‘sorry, transaction declined’,” he said on Network Ten’s Bolt Report on Sunday morning.
The report says income management could be used to “build capabilities as part of a case-management approach to assist the large number of disadvantaged young people not fully engaged in either education or work”.
Andrews stressed that the government would have a consultation process before making final decisions about which welfare recipients would be subject to income management.
“The government believes that income management is important. We believe that it’s had very positive effects for quite a number of people, not the least of which are women and children in indigenous and non-indigenous communities around Australia,” he said.
“In my conversations with them I’ve received many anecdotal reports about how beneficial this has been in terms of, particularly, their ability to buy food; to provide the necessities of life; to provide for their children, etcetera, but [an] extension of this, which we think is a good principle, how you do it, and what you might do, is part of this consultation process.”
The 170-page report has four main pillars, or aims: a simpler and sustainable income-support system; strengthening individual and family capability; engaging employers; and building community capacity.
There will be six weeks’ consultation on the interim report before the government is given a final version, complete with recommendations.
The Opposition’s support for the review is not guaranteed. The shadow treasurer, Chris Bowen, attacked the government’s approach to reviewing the DSP after reading a preview of the report in the Sunday Telegraph.
“I am sick of opening the Sunday paper every week and seeing Mr Andrews demonising disabled people. Labor supports measures to help people on the disability support pension back into work, where it’s possible and appropriate,” he said on the ABC’s Insiders program.
“That's what we did in office, with quite positive and remarkable results. What we don’t support is cutting people’s benefits on disability support in some brutal and blunt effort to force them back into inappropriate jobs. We won’t support that.”
An interim report, titled A New System for Better Employment and Social Outcomes, has been released in the form of a discussion paper, without recommendations.
It suggests streamlining welfare payments into four categories: the age pension; the DSP; a tiered work-age payment and a child payment. There would be more conditions attached to receiving welfare payments, and sanctions that would strip people of income support, for varying lengths of time, if they did not meet the “mutual obligations” requirement.
It says young and single unemployed people should receive lower rates of payment than other unemployed people, and that rent assistance should be reformed into a subsidy scheme for both public and private housing, rather than having public housing rent based on a percentage of a person’s income.
The report also identifies single parents as needing higher rates of payment as their children get older and it is more expensive to support them.
Only people with permanent disabilities should receive the DSP, and people who have partial, or short-term, disabilities should be given unemployment benefits instead, the report suggests. In addition, income management could be expanded into a national scheme so that young, unemployed people could only spend their benefits on certain things, such as food and petrol.
The head of the review, Patrick McClure, said the present welfare system was complex and inefficient, and there were actual disincentives to work. He highlighted people with mental health problems as needing different support to what they receive at present.
“Thirty per cent of people on the disability support pension have mental-health conditions which are episodic in nature; for example, severe depression or anxiety. Experts in the field express the importance of a vocational rehabilitation approach, which links them not only to clinical intervention but also to education and work,” he said on Sunday.
The social services minister, Kevin Andrews, has repeatedly called the DSP a set-and-forget payment, but he would not put a figure on the number of people who could lose the disability pension and be moved onto unemployment benefits.
“This is about recognising that the people on the DSP are not one group; they’re not the same. One of the largest groups on the DSP … is people with psychological illnesses and [a] … lot of that is episodic. There are occasions when people can and can’t work, yet the system doesn’t recognise that at the present time,” he said.
“Will they be forced off the disability support pension? No. This is about the future, as I said, not about the current system at the present time, but about how we can structure a system in the future which will give people the opportunity for what they usually want to do, and that is to be able to work, to be able to contribute. The current system is very inadequate in that regard.”
He said the committee would consider making the unemployment payment higher for people with partial disabilities. The government would get advice on how to classify people with a permanent disability.
Andrews endorsed moving young unemployed people onto income management schemes, giving them welfare in the form of debit cards that could only be used in certain places.
“We would say, you can have a debit card that precludes certain expenditure. It could, for example, preclude expenditure on alcohol. You get a card, go to the bottle shop and they say ‘sorry, transaction declined’,” he said on Network Ten’s Bolt Report on Sunday morning.
The report says income management could be used to “build capabilities as part of a case-management approach to assist the large number of disadvantaged young people not fully engaged in either education or work”.
Andrews stressed that the government would have a consultation process before making final decisions about which welfare recipients would be subject to income management.
“The government believes that income management is important. We believe that it’s had very positive effects for quite a number of people, not the least of which are women and children in indigenous and non-indigenous communities around Australia,” he said.
“In my conversations with them I’ve received many anecdotal reports about how beneficial this has been in terms of, particularly, their ability to buy food; to provide the necessities of life; to provide for their children, etcetera, but [an] extension of this, which we think is a good principle, how you do it, and what you might do, is part of this consultation process.”
The 170-page report has four main pillars, or aims: a simpler and sustainable income-support system; strengthening individual and family capability; engaging employers; and building community capacity.
There will be six weeks’ consultation on the interim report before the government is given a final version, complete with recommendations.
The Opposition’s support for the review is not guaranteed. The shadow treasurer, Chris Bowen, attacked the government’s approach to reviewing the DSP after reading a preview of the report in the Sunday Telegraph.
“I am sick of opening the Sunday paper every week and seeing Mr Andrews demonising disabled people. Labor supports measures to help people on the disability support pension back into work, where it’s possible and appropriate,” he said on the ABC’s Insiders program.
“That's what we did in office, with quite positive and remarkable results. What we don’t support is cutting people’s benefits on disability support in some brutal and blunt effort to force them back into inappropriate jobs. We won’t support that.”
Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/29/abbott-government-unveils-plan-to-restrict-how-young-people-spend-dole
Australians now have to face the fact, Australia is turning into a "third world country", just the same way America & Russia did. China protects it's Manufacturing Industries,has Full-Employment(not our phoney un-employment stats) and will eventually surpass America as the "numero uno" economy of the world! Get over it readers! Our "Western World" is finished!
I'm happy for the welfare issue to be looked at.. GREAT!
But let's look at ALL the facts in their entirety.
As Brett pointed out, Corporate Welfare, is one of them!!!
Where are all the funds going...ie.transparency.
Let's also look at all those rich families with multiple incomes and trust accounts and still put their hand up for welfare. I knew one woman who had about 8 income sources including 2 from Centrelink which she didn't need. Great for her but if others miss out on basic needs it's no joke!
How many MP's have trusts setup with family members as beneficiaries and as welfare recipients I wonder?
MP Andrews, you would be better investigating why current job employment agencies and the disability employment network doesn't get people jobs or do much of anything for people who really need help and support, instead of some futuristic visions of grandeur job plan. OMG... where do these MPS and Academics come from????
If more demands are placed on the welfare system, surely one with a modicum of intelligence would first look to the environment that surrounds such people? If one's environment was more attractive and beneficial to an individual or family than welfare payments, then welfare payments would disappear into the background.
However, as many know only too well, people on modest incomes have trouble surviving, whether it be rent/mortgages, bills, food, education and general living. Increased taxes throughout everything we buy, reduction of super from govt muckups, barely any decent returns for the average investor, higher insurances and public transport fares, excessive council rates, higher rego, petrol and on road costs, fines left right and centre, now more costs on medical, do I need to labour the point any longer?
Better systems, INCENTIVE and easier ways of living is what's needed for average Australians!!!!!
a)Over the past few generations government/corporate agents including politicians have lost/stolen our money. Exactly how and where is what these deceitful trustees refuse to be open and truthful about. Taxes have been payed from the early 1900s and in the 1940s separately for both public services and a person's retirement, so stripping away entitlements is dishonour, fraud and theft.
b)Our assets, resources and common wealth are being looted and stolen, sold of or given to foreign interests for practically nothing. And for this privilege, little or no taxes are paid or benefits given to the people.
c) Every person on this land is entitled to receive an equal share in the common wealth of Australia. This includes pensioners, disabled and those needy or unfortunate. Andrews, Hockey or Abbott have no say in this as much as they believe they do.
d)If you want to look at government handouts (referred to as welfare) the whole picture needs to be looked at incl. corporate welfare.
e)The government is a puppet simply doing what its told from other masters, stealing our coffers to fund someone else's piggy bank.
f)Abbott and anyone who partakes in these crimes are committing Treason, and should be hanged.
g)The government can issue its own currency and solve huge problems like other countries, yet it refuses to do so. Why?
h)The government can create incentives, public infrastructure that belongs to the people and a host of other measures that would see the live of Australians flourish, yet it chooses not. Why?
i)All these callous attacks and deprivation upon the Australian people are a distraction and no doubt part of a bigger agenda, but what? Agenda 21/TPP or something more sinister?
j)Government is not addressing the welfare issue, neither is he addressing the countries real issues of health and wealth creation and prosperity for all. This is a backwards government who clearly is not representing the Australian people and must be tossed out.
k)We must also be mindful that going from one party to another is not the right solution either, so now what peoples?
There is so much more that needs to made transparent and debated. The current political framework is a closed loop by only a few highly compensated individuals and therein lay the corruption and problem for us all.
1Will not be visible to public.
2Receive notification of other comments posted for this article. To cease notification after having posted click here.
3To make a link clickable in the comments box enclose in link tags - ie.<link>Link</link>.
4To show an image enclose the image URL in tags - ie.. Note: image may be resized if too large
To further have your say, head to our forum Click Here
To contribute a news article Click Here
To view or contribute a Quote Click Here