- Court not told of Darcey safety fears: chief justice
- Brisbane Times
- 06/02/2009 Make a Comment (1)
- Contributed by: Rambo ( 7 articles in 2009 )
The head of Australia's Family Court says relatives of the young girl thrown from Melbourne's West Gate Bridge did not take their concerns about the child's safety to the court.
The chief justice of the Family Court of Australia, Diana Bryant QC, made the rare move into public debate after relatives of Darcey Freeman accused the court system of failing their family.
Darcey, 4, died after plunging almost 60 metres from the bridge in Melbourne last week. Her father Arthur Phillip Freeman is facing a murder charge after allegedly throwing her to her death.
It's believed Darcey was farewelled at a private funeral service in Melbourne on Friday.
The day before her death, Darcey's parents had reached an agreement in the Federal Magistrates Court over the amount of time Mr Freeman could spend with his three children.
Federal Attorney-General Robert McClelland has asked his department to review the family's case.
Chief Justice Bryant said the court orders were made after an agreement between Darcey's parents was reached.
"The court obviously has to deal with issues of risk concerning children but it can only do so when parties raise those issues of risk with the court," she told ABC Radio.
"In this particular case ... the orders were made by consent. That is, they were not made by a decision of a judicial officer."
Chief Justice Bryant said a judge could refuse to make orders by consent if they were deemed not to be in the interests of the child.
"In this case ... the parties did not present to the judicial officer concerned, as part of their case, that this child was at risk of harm in the father's care," she said.
"The issues for determination were how much time the father should have with the child.
"The parties actually reached agreement about that issue and the judge didn't have to make a decision."
Chief Justice Bryant said no concerns were raised about the children's safety.
"That was not an issue," she said.
"You cannot blame the decision."
She said both parents were in court when the decision between them was reached.
"I would have to assume that if the mother had concerns they would have been raised and she would not have agreed to this decision, this order being made."
Chief Justice Bryant said family breakdown was the second most stressful event people dealt with, after death.
She said court hearings added to the emotional stress surrounding family breakdowns.
Darcey's uncle Tim Barnes issued a statement on Thursday accusing the court system of letting the family down.
"For the past two years, the various authorities have been made aware of our fear for the safety of the children and unfortunately no one would listen," he said.
"We feel the judicial system has failed our family and will continue to fail other families until someone in authority starts to take action."
Mr McClelland said he had asked his department to review the "distressing" case.
"Family law is an extremely difficult area and if there is anything we can learn from this tragedy to improve how the system is run we will not hesitate to take the necessary action," he said in a statement.
Darcey's family has asked The Alannah and Madeline Foundation to set up a trust fund after receiving an overwhelming number of requests from people wishing to donate money.
The fund will be used to assist Darcey's two brothers, Ben and Jack.
The foundation will also be looking into establishing a children's day in Darcey's memory.
The chief justice of the Family Court of Australia, Diana Bryant QC, made the rare move into public debate after relatives of Darcey Freeman accused the court system of failing their family.
Darcey, 4, died after plunging almost 60 metres from the bridge in Melbourne last week. Her father Arthur Phillip Freeman is facing a murder charge after allegedly throwing her to her death.
It's believed Darcey was farewelled at a private funeral service in Melbourne on Friday.
The day before her death, Darcey's parents had reached an agreement in the Federal Magistrates Court over the amount of time Mr Freeman could spend with his three children.
Federal Attorney-General Robert McClelland has asked his department to review the family's case.
Chief Justice Bryant said the court orders were made after an agreement between Darcey's parents was reached.
"The court obviously has to deal with issues of risk concerning children but it can only do so when parties raise those issues of risk with the court," she told ABC Radio.
"In this particular case ... the orders were made by consent. That is, they were not made by a decision of a judicial officer."
Chief Justice Bryant said a judge could refuse to make orders by consent if they were deemed not to be in the interests of the child.
"In this case ... the parties did not present to the judicial officer concerned, as part of their case, that this child was at risk of harm in the father's care," she said.
"The issues for determination were how much time the father should have with the child.
"The parties actually reached agreement about that issue and the judge didn't have to make a decision."
Chief Justice Bryant said no concerns were raised about the children's safety.
"That was not an issue," she said.
"You cannot blame the decision."
She said both parents were in court when the decision between them was reached.
"I would have to assume that if the mother had concerns they would have been raised and she would not have agreed to this decision, this order being made."
Chief Justice Bryant said family breakdown was the second most stressful event people dealt with, after death.
She said court hearings added to the emotional stress surrounding family breakdowns.
Darcey's uncle Tim Barnes issued a statement on Thursday accusing the court system of letting the family down.
"For the past two years, the various authorities have been made aware of our fear for the safety of the children and unfortunately no one would listen," he said.
"We feel the judicial system has failed our family and will continue to fail other families until someone in authority starts to take action."
Mr McClelland said he had asked his department to review the "distressing" case.
"Family law is an extremely difficult area and if there is anything we can learn from this tragedy to improve how the system is run we will not hesitate to take the necessary action," he said in a statement.
Darcey's family has asked The Alannah and Madeline Foundation to set up a trust fund after receiving an overwhelming number of requests from people wishing to donate money.
The fund will be used to assist Darcey's two brothers, Ben and Jack.
The foundation will also be looking into establishing a children's day in Darcey's memory.
Source: https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/national/court-not-told-of-darcey-safety-fears-chief-justice/2009/02/06/1233423490129.html
However, those who have been dragged through that shit hole of a place, yes that's right, the Family Court, know very well about the PRESSURE, tricks and games placed upon parents by lawyers not to go before a judge for a decision.
Especially fathers or parents that don't already have primary residence/custody, are always led to believe outside the court room that they will get a better deal if they agree to consent, as much as sometimes you don't want to or think it's plain wrong.
With rattled emotions, naivety, fear and lack of knowledge clouding your decision making capacity, you turn to your lawyers advice, or if without a lawyer you make the best decision you possibly can. In a very short time you are ultimately forced to make serious and long term decisions about your children and the lifestyle you once had.
You usually feel numb, comatosed and in shock. If you are think you're always in control, it's possibly just an illusion.
Amongst your thoughts in making these all important and unchangeable decisions (or so you think) other factors of financial limitations, wanting to minimise further delays and costs run through your head.
Perhaps it's hard to take time off from work, you have a heap of nasty allegations against you whacking your ego and self image hard, embarrassing and humiliating you, not quite knowing the games that get played in Family Court warfare.
So all in all, Consent Orders aren't always the mutually agreeable decisions that you might think. They're often a rush job. Have you ever noticed how Consent Orders always get conveniently wrapped up before lunch time or more often before the end of the day?
When you start to understand the legal money making racket that exists, only then will you start waking up to the fact that Darcey's death was no accident or solely committed by the father.
1Will not be visible to public.
2Receive notification of other comments posted for this article. To cease notification after having posted click here.
3To make a link clickable in the comments box enclose in link tags - ie.<link>Link</link>.
4To show an image enclose the image URL in tags - ie.. Note: image may be resized if too large
To further have your say, head to our forum Click Here
To contribute a news article Click Here
To view or contribute a Quote Click Here