Previous article

News Articles

  • Council takes $12 ticket fight to High Court
  • 27/08/2014 Make a Comment
  • Contributed by: BigJoe ( 26 articles in 2014 )
TICKETED: Al O'Connor has fought the Hutt City Council over parking.
Click to receive your Free Guide
Be Grateful Today!
A legal researcher's determined effort to prove Hutt City Council did not have the power to issue him a $12 parking ticket has come at a $10,000 cost to the council.

Al O'Connor, a Victoria University masters student, challenged the ticket saying the time restrictions imposed by the council were not valid. He won his case in the district court in June.

The parking restriction, for parking more than 120 minutes in Port Rd, Seaview, in June last year, had been in operation for seven years.

O'Connor said the council had issued more than 7000 tickets since he began the challenge and, over the years, it could have issued as many as $1 million worth.

Yesterday the council appealed to the High Court, saying it was extraordinary to suggest that the council had no rule-making power to control parking.

Lawyer for the council Richard Fowler, QC, said that, under the Traffic Control Devices Rules, there was a general power to make restrictions, although some, such as designating areas as coupon parking, would need a bylaw.

He said it would be very odd if the council had the power to close roads but not to control parking on them.

The means of creating the restrictions were part of the Traffic Control Devices Rules, which was what was intended.

Donald Stevens, QC, for O'Connor, cited the same piece of legislation, saying it did not authorise the council to restrict parking, but was limited to indicating the restrictions that had to be implemented through a bylaw.

A bylaw would be needed to restrict the length of parking time. A Hutt City Council bylaw already, in effect, mentioned some restrictions, but did not mention length of time.

Justice Denis Clifford reserved his decision.

Hutt City Council solicitor Bradley Cato said its lawyers had updated their submissions from the district court at no cost and the Queen's counsel used had capped their fees at $10,000 for the appeal.

Cato said the council decided to appeal because the district court decision had implications for the way it had been authorising its parking signage throughout the district.

Source: https://www.stuff.co.nz/motoring/news/10426999/Council-takes-12-ticket-fight-to-High-Court


     5+7= 
    (Note: If wrong - comments will not be posted)
    Footnotes:

    1Will not be visible to public.
    2Receive notification of other comments posted for this article. To cease notification after having posted click here.
    3To make a link clickable in the comments box enclose in link tags - ie.<link>Link</link>.
    4To show an image enclose the image URL in tags - ie.. Note: image may be resized if too large

    To further have your say, head to our forum Click Here

    To contribute a news article Click Here

    To view or contribute a Quote Click Here

    Hosting & Support by WebPal© 2026 f4joz.com All rights reserved.