- Chemtrails: Informed consent or not?
- 29/01/2015 Make a Comment
- Contributed by: Sol ( 3 articles in 2015 )
US Law Allowing 'Chemtrailing' passed in 1997 | PUBLIC LAW 105—85—NOV. 18, 1997: Use of Human Subjects for Testing of Chemical and Biological Agents
Updated - 1.29.2015 7:18pm - Someone was kind enough to share this 'debunking' of the law and it's applicability to chemtrails on our facebook page. I want to take to the time to debunk the debunking.
Here is the debunking post. The debunking is centered around the concept it prevents weapon testing from being used on the public, without informed consent. The debunker goes on to provide that informed consent is similar to when we agree explicitly to have a medical procedure done in a Hospital. Which is one example, but this does not consider all the uses of the informed consent mechanism in legal codes.
As was mentioned below, our status as Agents of Government compel us to stay informed about all legal codes which are passed. Much like working for a company requires you to be aware of changes in company policy. As such, our consent is informed, because it is public 'law', and the burden of protest falls on us. We by our own negligence consent to the legal policy. The debunker failed to address this point with any substance.
Secondly, the bill specifically provides exceptions to Informed consent, one of which is: "(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control." Our status as citizens or civilians, is defined in the Trading with the Enemy Act, as enemies of the state. The government must defend itself from the public.
Finally, Geoengineering is continues under the auspices of protecting the public from 'global warming.' While this is not official public policy, if one can read in between the lines, the inference is clear.
Of course none of this is needed if you just trust your own eyes. Chemtrailing is happening, and it does contain all of the things mentioned in the cited 'Law', we maybe able to debate what law applies to, but the reality of Geoengineering is self evident.
Thank you Hans for sharing this with us!
The reality of Chemtrails is obvious to most people. But the ability of the general public to ignore reality is profound, as we have been trained from birth to believe what makes us feel better, instead of aligning ourselves with the truth. Hence the plethora of skeptics who reject any idea that counter's their bias; without actually investigating it. A true skeptic, seeks out ALL data within the context of an idea, and then makes an educated determination about validity; acknowledging that validity is determined by supportive data not personal bias.
The follow is an analysis of U.S. "Law" describing the use of Biological Agents on the population. Since every Citizen of the USA is an agent of government (per their birth certificate and social security card, amongst other things) when a Legal code is passed it places the imperative of objection on each citizen. Failure to take action, and unconsent from the contract which allows the government to test biological agents, is consent; acquiescence. This can be clearly understood in the post Trust Law: How You Became A Commodity - The Creation of Constructive Trusts.
- Justin
Source - Global Sky Watch
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
U.S. Law Allows Testing of Chemicals and Biological Agents on "Civilian Population"
So section (a) prohibits these cruel and inhumane chemical and biological tests on humans.
Then section (b) says that the prohibitions in section (a) do not apply to tests carried out for virtually any purpose. So section (b) completely negates the prohibitions of section (a).
In Other Words:
The U.S. government can test chemicals and biological agents on humans for nearly any purpose they desire.
The Following Should Also Be Noted
The term "biological agent" as stated above in (a)(1) is defined in (e) as follows:
In Other Words:
The U.S. government can test chemicals and biological agents on humans that cause death, biological malfunction, and deleterious alteration of the environment. The term "deleterious alteration of the environment" brings chemtrails to mind.
Read about actual human chemical testing programs currently in operation:
https://herballure.com/chemtrails
Read the full text of this law here. Page 287 contains the above excerpt. The Section is 1078. This is placed in the US Code (UCS) at 50 USC 1520a:
Public Law 105-85
Some argue that none of this activity can be conducted without "informed consent", as stated in section (c), which reads:
Quote:
(c) INFORMED CONSENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense
may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject.
Although section (c) seems to provide some protection for us in that it requires us to be notified "in advance" if this "testing" is to take place, in reality, it does not provide any protection at all.
Why not?
Because you've already been "informed in advance" and you've already given your "consent".
Because this "law" is publicly available for everyone to read, you have been "informed". Because you have not contested it (that's what the courts are for), you have provided your "consent".
This law is part of a contract between you and the government. When the terms of a contract are known and uncontested, it's called "acquiescence". Acquiescence essentially means that both parties are in agreement.
Acquiesce: "submit or comply silently or without protest"
So, when this law was published, you were "informed". Because you have not challenged it in court, you have "consented". By your own inaction, you have said, "Sure, go ahead and poison me, even if it causes death. I have no problem with it."
Because this contract meets the judicial requirements of "remedy" and "recourse", it is legally binding.
Judges like to say: "Ignorance of the law is no excuse". They say this because you are expected to know all of the "law" because it is publicly available for you to read (despite the fact that this is humanly impossible).
So, in reality, section (c) is legally useless. It does not provide any additional protection, it only "seems" to. Section (c)'s only purpose for being included in this law is deception, nothing more.
Deception
Section (c) of this "law" is very deceptive because most people don't understand the concepts of acquiescence in contract law, therefore, people mistakenly conclude that this "testing" will never happen to them unless they are informed about it.
The powers-that-be play upon public ignorance by inducing people into having a false sense of security. As a result, the public believes this activity could not be occurring because they believe that they would have personally heard about it. This false belief then provides insurance that this law will never be contested in court, and as long as this law remains uncontested, chemtrail spraying will continue unhindered.
The final result is that this craftily-written law has done its job. It has enabled chemtrail spraying to continue without being contested in court. Additionally, this law continually provides legal protection for those doing the spraying. After all, by your inaction you have given them your permission.
When you consider the incredibly dark nature of this deception and when you consider the fact that this law gives your public servants the self-appointed power to kill you, you should then consider what kind of people are running your country, or the world for that matter.
Supplement
This Public Law in The US Code: Title 50, 1520a
Updated - 1.29.2015 7:18pm - Someone was kind enough to share this 'debunking' of the law and it's applicability to chemtrails on our facebook page. I want to take to the time to debunk the debunking.
Here is the debunking post. The debunking is centered around the concept it prevents weapon testing from being used on the public, without informed consent. The debunker goes on to provide that informed consent is similar to when we agree explicitly to have a medical procedure done in a Hospital. Which is one example, but this does not consider all the uses of the informed consent mechanism in legal codes.
As was mentioned below, our status as Agents of Government compel us to stay informed about all legal codes which are passed. Much like working for a company requires you to be aware of changes in company policy. As such, our consent is informed, because it is public 'law', and the burden of protest falls on us. We by our own negligence consent to the legal policy. The debunker failed to address this point with any substance.
Secondly, the bill specifically provides exceptions to Informed consent, one of which is: "(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control." Our status as citizens or civilians, is defined in the Trading with the Enemy Act, as enemies of the state. The government must defend itself from the public.
Finally, Geoengineering is continues under the auspices of protecting the public from 'global warming.' While this is not official public policy, if one can read in between the lines, the inference is clear.
Of course none of this is needed if you just trust your own eyes. Chemtrailing is happening, and it does contain all of the things mentioned in the cited 'Law', we maybe able to debate what law applies to, but the reality of Geoengineering is self evident.
Thank you Hans for sharing this with us!
The reality of Chemtrails is obvious to most people. But the ability of the general public to ignore reality is profound, as we have been trained from birth to believe what makes us feel better, instead of aligning ourselves with the truth. Hence the plethora of skeptics who reject any idea that counter's their bias; without actually investigating it. A true skeptic, seeks out ALL data within the context of an idea, and then makes an educated determination about validity; acknowledging that validity is determined by supportive data not personal bias.
The follow is an analysis of U.S. "Law" describing the use of Biological Agents on the population. Since every Citizen of the USA is an agent of government (per their birth certificate and social security card, amongst other things) when a Legal code is passed it places the imperative of objection on each citizen. Failure to take action, and unconsent from the contract which allows the government to test biological agents, is consent; acquiescence. This can be clearly understood in the post Trust Law: How You Became A Commodity - The Creation of Constructive Trusts.
- Justin
Source - Global Sky Watch
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
U.S. Law Allows Testing of Chemicals and Biological Agents on "Civilian Population"
Quote:
PUBLIC LAW 105—85—NOV. 18, 1997: USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTSFOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGENTS
SEC. 1078. RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGENTS.
(a) PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES.—The Secretary of Defense may notconduct (directly or by contract)
(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent orbiological agent on a civilian population; or
(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.
(b) EXCEPTIONS.—Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e), the prohibition in subsection (a) does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:
(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.
(2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.
(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control.
PUBLIC LAW 105—85—NOV. 18, 1997: USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTSFOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGENTS
SEC. 1078. RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF HUMAN SUBJECTS FOR TESTING OF CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL AGENTS.
(a) PROHIBITED ACTIVITIES.—The Secretary of Defense may notconduct (directly or by contract)
(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent orbiological agent on a civilian population; or
(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.
(b) EXCEPTIONS.—Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e), the prohibition in subsection (a) does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:
(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.
(2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.
(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control.
So section (a) prohibits these cruel and inhumane chemical and biological tests on humans.
Then section (b) says that the prohibitions in section (a) do not apply to tests carried out for virtually any purpose. So section (b) completely negates the prohibitions of section (a).
In Other Words:
The U.S. government can test chemicals and biological agents on humans for nearly any purpose they desire.
The Following Should Also Be Noted
The term "biological agent" as stated above in (a)(1) is defined in (e) as follows:
Quote:
(e) BIOLOGICAL AGENT DEFINED.—In this section, the term
‘‘biological agent’’ means any micro-organism (including bacteria,
viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance,
and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized
component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance,
whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable
of causing—
(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a
human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;
(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or
materials of any kind; or
(3) deleterious alteration of the environment.
(e) BIOLOGICAL AGENT DEFINED.—In this section, the term
‘‘biological agent’’ means any micro-organism (including bacteria,
viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance,
and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized
component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance,
whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable
of causing—
(1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a
human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;
(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or
materials of any kind; or
(3) deleterious alteration of the environment.
In Other Words:
The U.S. government can test chemicals and biological agents on humans that cause death, biological malfunction, and deleterious alteration of the environment. The term "deleterious alteration of the environment" brings chemtrails to mind.
Read about actual human chemical testing programs currently in operation:
https://herballure.com/chemtrails
Read the full text of this law here. Page 287 contains the above excerpt. The Section is 1078. This is placed in the US Code (UCS) at 50 USC 1520a:
Public Law 105-85
Informed Consent
Some argue that none of this activity can be conducted without "informed consent", as stated in section (c), which reads:
Quote:
(c) INFORMED CONSENT REQUIRED.—The Secretary of Defense
may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject.
Although section (c) seems to provide some protection for us in that it requires us to be notified "in advance" if this "testing" is to take place, in reality, it does not provide any protection at all.
Why not?
Because you've already been "informed in advance" and you've already given your "consent".
Because this "law" is publicly available for everyone to read, you have been "informed". Because you have not contested it (that's what the courts are for), you have provided your "consent".
This law is part of a contract between you and the government. When the terms of a contract are known and uncontested, it's called "acquiescence". Acquiescence essentially means that both parties are in agreement.
Acquiesce: "submit or comply silently or without protest"
So, when this law was published, you were "informed". Because you have not challenged it in court, you have "consented". By your own inaction, you have said, "Sure, go ahead and poison me, even if it causes death. I have no problem with it."
Because this contract meets the judicial requirements of "remedy" and "recourse", it is legally binding.
Judges like to say: "Ignorance of the law is no excuse". They say this because you are expected to know all of the "law" because it is publicly available for you to read (despite the fact that this is humanly impossible).
So, in reality, section (c) is legally useless. It does not provide any additional protection, it only "seems" to. Section (c)'s only purpose for being included in this law is deception, nothing more.
Deception
Section (c) of this "law" is very deceptive because most people don't understand the concepts of acquiescence in contract law, therefore, people mistakenly conclude that this "testing" will never happen to them unless they are informed about it.
The powers-that-be play upon public ignorance by inducing people into having a false sense of security. As a result, the public believes this activity could not be occurring because they believe that they would have personally heard about it. This false belief then provides insurance that this law will never be contested in court, and as long as this law remains uncontested, chemtrail spraying will continue unhindered.
The final result is that this craftily-written law has done its job. It has enabled chemtrail spraying to continue without being contested in court. Additionally, this law continually provides legal protection for those doing the spraying. After all, by your inaction you have given them your permission.
When you consider the incredibly dark nature of this deception and when you consider the fact that this law gives your public servants the self-appointed power to kill you, you should then consider what kind of people are running your country, or the world for that matter.
Supplement
This Public Law in The US Code: Title 50, 1520a
Source: https://sitsshow.blogspot.com.au/2015/01/us-law-allowing-chemtrailing-passed-in.html
1Will not be visible to public.
2Receive notification of other comments posted for this article. To cease notification after having posted click here.
3To make a link clickable in the comments box enclose in link tags - ie.<link>Link</link>.
4To show an image enclose the image URL in tags - ie.. Note: image may be resized if too large
To further have your say, head to our forum Click Here
To contribute a news article Click Here
To view or contribute a Quote Click Here